, has launched any other record detailing the state of the Canadian wi-fi marketplace, this time analyzing why festival is so susceptible.
The 10-page teaser record,on September 8, 2019, main points, “the Canadian wi-fi marketplace is dominated via provincial cell community duopolies and monopolies. Whilst in some provinces regional operators more and more problem the incumbents, on the nationwide degree, Canada is a de-factor community duopoly.”
Root reason behind susceptible festival within the Canadian wi-fi marketplace: The Canadian wi-fi marketplace is dominated via provincial cell community duopolies and monopolies.
Newest Rewheel PRO-study is now to be had
— Rewheel/analysis (@RewheelResearch) September 9, 2019
Rewheel says the “fragmented” Canadian wi-fi marketplace and its “provincial cell community duopolies and monopolies” are “stitched in combination via in depth and most likely coordinated roaming and community sharing agreements.”
The be taught says handiest in Quebec did they in finding four wi-fi carriers running “unbiased and really extensive cell community infrastructure.”
On the subject of Canada’s Giant 3 wi-fi carriers, Rogers, Telus and Bell, Rewheel says their collaborative nature in the case of reciprocal community sharing and spectrum cross-licensing, as an example, “are possibly restrictive and anti-competitive.”
Rewheel additionally says the CRTC and its mandated wholesale charges for nationwide roaming knowledge are “over the top” and “useless”, as they’re in accordance with a incorrect technique and handiest offer protection to the “duopolistic community construction” from new competition.
The be taught says the selection of macro mobile websites in position via Rogers, Telus and Bell, are about the similar or not up to Finnish wi-fi operators, in spite of Canada having “6x extra inhabitants and 30x higher land house,” countering an issue via the Giant 3 bringing up world-leading cell community efficiency.
Telus leads with a 29% proportion of distinct mobile websites, adopted via Rogers at 27% and Bell at 25%, then adopted via Freedom Cellular at 7%, and regional carriers Videotron at 4%, Sasktel at 3%, Bragg at 2% and different at 2%.
Rewheel provides the instance of Manitoba, the place Telus handiest has mobile websites in Winnipeg and alongside some main roads within the south. Rather than that, Rogers has probably the most in depth protection adopted via Bell. The usage of Open Cellular Identification knowledge, Rewheel says there may be coordination between the Giant 3 in spaces of Manitoba.
In a similar way, in Vancouver, Rewheel says “Bell has principally no personal mobile websites and spectrum deployed in Vancouver,” with the corporate’s community “emulated” at the Telus community the use of multi-operator core community (MOCN) for sharing.
Rewheel says reciprocal community sharing “considerably restricts the independency of Canadian wi-fi networks.”
Find out how to repair the non-competitive Canadian wi-fi marketplace? Rewheel says even mandated cell community digital operators (MNVOs)—which the CRTC is pushing for—is not going to building up festival, as reasonably, “vital structural treatments are required.”